Haven’t been blogging that much mainly cos I have been tired therefore lack energy to write something thoughtful…usually I bang out these posts in a conveyor belt style but alas I have been doing other things..mainly politicking and campaigning. Just not the time to write so world has been passing me by a tad.
There has been interesting posts over at TCF such as on the Labour Left , future of the Left , and Paul’s Labour Left 5. plan. Plus this article (thanks to Splintered for telling me about it) And this from AVPS re Compass, all of which I have been meaning to engage in as these are important questions and discussions to be had around how the Left organises in the next few months but after the next general election ‘cos whoever gets elected there will be a fight to be had. Also, it is an excuse for me (haha) to debate the merits of democratic centralism and witness the collective cyberspace glazed over expressions of comrades….
But in the meantime, Kevin raises important questions about Griffin standing against Margaret Hodge, what does the Left do, call for a vote for Hodge based on ‘anyone other than Griffin’?
And this post troubled me a lot. I find myself despairing at both the post and the comments (indeed I really thought I had stumbled onto the comments of CiF). And it becomes like another Groundhog Day experience. Many on the Left shoulda, coulda and do know better when it comes to feminism but it is easier to indulge in the usual sexist, defensive and tired old tabloid-esque parodies. And the usual argument that has been thrown at me in the past is that feminism is ‘petit – bourgeois’ (I had this ‘debate’ in Weekly Worker a couple of years ago). And this reminds me of Barbara Ehrenreich when she wrote about ‘mechanical Marxists’ who ignore the totality of society and how patriarchal capitalism invades every sphere of life. And frankly, I describe myself as a Socialist feminist as feminism is integral to Socialism. Yes, there are various different strands of feminism but why it is when it is debated sometimes on the Left it is belittled, disregarded, devalued and parodied by mainly men, who, to be honest view oppression in a very reductionist way. And ask yourself, why do many active and organised feminists by-pass the Left…? One reason, ‘cos they have to put up with this kind of crap that goes by the name of debate.
When I first got involved in politics in the mid-1980s many of leftie men I encountered professed some understanding of feminism, indeed not perfect not brilliant but at that time there was a still functioning dynamic feminist movement and a vibrant Left that did influence, ideas feeding off each other. But rather like the Left, feminist movement is smaller and fragmented therefore that influence in developing political consciousness about women’s oppression isn’t that great. Like I said, it wasn’t perfect and I always encountered individuals/groups who dismissed feminism but certainly there was at least some understanding. But then you had/have leftie blokes who had/have, for example, an excellent grasp of dialectical materialism yet knew/know basically sweet fa about feminism….There’s no bloody excuse for it.
I think the comment that best sums up the ‘debate’ over at Dave’s blog is Eddie Truman’s, Ha ha, man spouts sexist drivel knowing fine well it’ll wind up the women comrades, male comrades all laugh together and get another round in at the bar.
I think Eddie hits the nail on the head when it comes to these defensive leftie men. And that’s how I certainly saw the ‘debate’.
Posted by harpymarx 
Posted by harpymarx
Posted by harpymarx 