It’s Spring….

Dinos0309

I detect it’s Spring. Mainly due to the park being open when I get off the train after work. And it’s lighter.

GeeseAndDinos

So I had a wander around the park to say hello to the Victorian dinos on the banks of the lake (imagining Doug McClure and Rod Taylor still fighting the pesky monsters invigorated by the start of Spring with the special effects by Harryhausen).

Swan0309

Anyway, just to wish bon voyage to Pete and Terry who are off on some intrepid journeys for 3 months, which includes Mexico, Peru, Chile, Galapagos, Easter Island..and more.

Daffs0309

 By the time they get back the revolution may have happened… Then again, I heavily predict, it won’t have…

NestInTheWater0309

I predict a riot….?

Well, UEL have capitulated and therefore caved in by calling off their ‘alternative’ G20 summit. The reason being the event was linked to possible direct action protests against the G20 summit, which have been widely publicised in the media.

Furthermore

 As a university, we have a duty of care, and our primary responsibility is to maintain a safe and secure campus environment for staff, students and visitors. Following discussions on Friday with UCU representatives, it was agreed that the potential scale of the event and associated risks had become unmanageable, and we would be unable to accommodate safely an event of this nature.

And this is the University that suspended Chris Knight. I have heard Chris speak a number of times and been involved in campaigns he has been involved in. He has never struck me as some street fighting bloke!

And the fact the right-wing media has attacked him over his remarks hence his suspension is bizarre indeed.  Just smacks of a rather spineless institution.

It seems like fever pitch at the moment with sensationalist headlines and expectations that the City will burn tomorrow. The anticipation of a riot. I can predict that the cops will be heavy handed, brutal and violent…what’s new there!

I probably will try to go on the demos tomorrow and Thursday with me camera. I must admit I am nervous about the cops tactics tomorrow and Thursday.

Oh, well, I will see what happens….

The Wire: at bleedin’ last..!!

It is apparently Barack Obama’s favourite television show. It had a massive cult following in the States yet it has taken British terrestrial a snail pace of 6 years to be finally shown on BBC2. But at some stupid hour, mind you! It is reminiscent of the Sopranos being shown late on Channel 4. The Wire is here……..finally!

Five nights a week for the next twelve weeks.

It pulled in 600,000 viewers last night according to reports. So why did it take terrestrial telly so long? It was available on cable etc. Anyway, another impressive drama from the HBO stable.

Unfortunately, I only got to see about half of it (but I did hear Tom Waits wonderful music at the start of the opening credits) as I was tuning my new television. And whatta a programme to be finally tuned into..!!

Mine eyes dazzled at the quality of the picture as opposed to watching something in a snow storm..

The Wire has been described as a gritty and bleak piece of uncompromising drama. Last night we were introduced to the various characters, Baltimore cops, Detective McNulty (Dominic West who has starred in enough Brit costume dramas over the years though he was impressive in McKellen’s Richard III as Henry, Earl of Richmond) along with the city bureaucrats, drug dealers, crime bosses, gangs.

Many other cop dramas (including ones over here) flesh out the law enforcers with more developed characterisation though that can be utterly stereotypical (good v bad) but the criminals are usually reduced to 1-dimensions.

The Wire, though this was my first viewing, seemed to buck that convention. I have heard so much about The Wire, I will be watching in anticipation especially regarding plot, storylines, dialogue and cinematography.

In my opinion, there does seem to be a more documentary feel about the drama, which gives it more powerful and realistism. Comparsions have been made with the procedural cop 1990s show, Homicide: Life on the Street.

I am sticking with it…. Though will probably get the DVDs… as at the time it is being televisied I should be asleep… (indeed, sign of my age).

Psychiatric ASBOs skyrocketing

More than 1,200 people in England have been made subject to compulsory treatment outside hospital five months after the powers were introduced under the Mental Health Act 2007.

I wrote about the ushering in of the draconian CTOs (Community Treatment Orders) aka Psychiatric ASBOs as part of the changes to the Mental Health Act last November.

And figures released in a statement from the Mental Health Act Commission in the past few days state that the demand had far exceeded expectations.

And campaigners against CTOs argue: “It is already evident that the government has underestimated the likely numbers of people being put on supervised community treatment. We believe that the number could rise to some 10,000 people over the next decade.”  (Simon Lawton-Smith, head of policy at the Mental Health Foundation).

Research conducted by the King’s Fund  have estimated there will be a gradual year on increase of numbers. They believe it is more likely that between 7,000-13,000 service users could be placed on CTOs over the next 10-15 years.

CTOs are a way, New Labour claimed, of reducing psychiatric admissions yet studies have shown in Australia, that CTO placement, aboriginal ethnicity, younger age, personality disorder and previous health service use were all associated with increased admission rates. The authors conclusion stated that we “should question the rationale for CTOs and advocate more effective treatments” (British Journal of Psychiatry, 2004).

Furthermore, The Institute Of Psychiatry’s “International experiences of using CTOs” (March 2007) noted as well that ethnicity data from Israel, USA, New Zealand and Australia,“indicate that relative to the proportion of the general population comprised by their ethnic group, most ethnic groups might be over-represented amongst CTO recipients.”

And bear in mind  that young Black men are 38% more likely than the average to be sectioned under the Mental Health Act in the UK. It will be interesting to see a breakdown of these statistics regarding race and gender in relation to CTOs.
And where are the safeguards, right of appeal?
This doesn’t bode well either: Campaigners remain “deeply concerned” that people subject to compulsory powers under the Mental Health Act 2007 will miss out on an advocacy service to be launched next week.

Mind’s policy and campaigns manager Anna Bird said service users could be waiting “many more months” after the 1 April deadline before fully trained advocates are available in some parts of England.

The 3 C’s of NL….compulsion, coercion and conformity….

Jacqui-gate

So Jacqui Smith is embarrassed. I bet her constituents are a lot more embarrassed having her as their MP (and especially as she has a slim majority).

Though she is indeed cross at her husband for ‘”mistakenly” claiming the cost of two adult movies on Commons expenses’.

Oh, and the euphemistic language of ‘adult films’… Porn is porn. Laughable really especially considering Smith’s social authoritarian agenda.

Mistakenly…? Easily done, isn’t it, sticking a couple of DVDs on the tab and claiming it back, inadvertently

And is it correct to employ your nearest and dearest as your assistant?

A government limping pathetically to the next election, while sticking their greedy unaccountable snouts in the trough, fiddling their expenses while the economy burns……

The Damned United

damnedunited

I have hazy memories of watching my older brother play football in Victoria Park, Smethwick, circa mid-1970s. He wore a red kit in honour of his favourite team, Manchester United (I was brought up in a family that supported Aston Villa and Manchester United). I remember the trophies he won at football. He was spotted by a football scout who believed he was talented and would go far. The scout spoke to my parents telling them he was offering my brother a trial at a football club (can’t recall which one). My brother turned it down, he had his heart set on being a sculptor. He wanted to go to art college and possibly do a fine art degree later. That was my brother’s plan and he stuck to it. I do wonder whether he regretted his decision he made as a teenager.

 Bremner, Giles, Lorimar, Best, Keegan….. conjure up 1970s Saturdays and Sundays of the big matches on television that I endured as a kid… The highlights on Grandstand along with the football scores at the end (and the Football Pools) patiently waiting for Dr Who to start.

These were my memories watching the excellent The Damned United. Based on David Peace’s eponymous book, and if you are expecting a similar adaptation like the recent televised Red Ridingtrilogy then you will be a tad disappointed. The book which has much more stark and grim overtones while the film is more comedic, and concentrates on Clough’s enduring friendship with Peter Taylor. Another omission is that the book gives more of a psychological insight into Brian Clough.

In saying all that the end result surprised me.

Brian Clough (Michael Sheen) was manager in 1974 for 44 days at Leeds United before being sacked. The previous manager was Clough’s rival, Don Revie, who went on to manage the England team. The film revolves around those 44 days. Though to give context to the macho rivalry between Revie and Clough the film flits backwards and forwards between ’68/69 and 1974. Some reviewers have found this device confusing but to establish the beginnings of this obsession Clough had with Revie you have to go back. The film juxtaposes the friendship between Clough/Taylor (which disintegrates over professional conflicts) and the rivalry with Revie.

There is a kind of warlike battle cry imagery when Clough psyches up the nervous and twitchy Derby County footballers when about to face Leeds United. They still lose…

The film splices actual footage from that period which gives it a powerful kick. We witness the rise of Clough and Peter Taylor (Timothy Spall) leading Derby County into the Second and First Divisions ending with various meets with Leeds United. And making Clough more determined that his club Derby will beat Leeds.

What is impressive about the film is the interactions between the two leads, Spall and Sheen. There is real enduring believable friendship. In essence, the film isn’t truly about football (it has more of a secondary function) it’s about the dynamics between Taylor and Clough. And the trials and tribulations between the two, talkative wisecracking Clough to the more quiet thoughtful Taylor. Both Spall and Sheen give wonderful perfomances. Sheen gives an exceptional interpretation of Clough’s complex ’flawed genius’ personality, a wisecracking, sharp tongued, quipping man driven by obsession and ambition. You sympathise with Sheen’s portrayal and kind of admire Clough giving the Board hell though as Peter Taylor acknowledged there were times he should keep his mouth shut!

And what I also like about Sheen (and in previous films) is that he doesn’t just demonstrate the character through dialogue and language but through the dimension of expression and non-verbal communication. The (in) famous scene where Clough and Revie go head to head in an interview orchestrated by Austin Mitchell ends with Clough sitting quietly while the lights go out of the studio, he is left staring, dejectedly, into space. And the chameleon like Sheen captures it.

Revie (Colm Meaney) is portrayed as the archetypal old-fashion style football manager while Clough, younger, wants to emphasis skill and clear out the cheating and fouling he sees in Leeds United. Clough is a risk taker who can’t be controlled while Revie is a ‘safe pair of hands’. Socialist Clough is described at the end of the film as, ‘the best British manager the England football team never had’.

Everything about this film from the dialogue, performances, splicing footage, and cinematography captures the 1970s. There isn’t an over emphasis on 1970s products, it is very sparing same with the soundtrack.

The film doesn’t need to try too hard to make you believe it is the late 1960s or mid-1970s. The football crowd is white and male. The women in Taylor’s and Clough’s life are relegated to the background, we don’t get any impressions of what they thought about any of this, except telling them that ‘tea is on the table’. But that’s the traditional straitjacketed role women were expected to fulfil…though I think the film also examines, superficially, the contradictions of masculinity.

Even the grainy quality of the film gives it an extra 70s feel. The hair styles, football kits, the run down clubs, the design of the coaches taking the footballers to fixtures, interiors, clothes…all these simple devices pulls the viewer back into the 1970s. Also, the days before football become commercialised and corporatised, the big money spinner where the fans are caught between a rock and a hard place, supporting your team but at an overwhelming financial cost (there’s a scene where Clough, presciently, says to the Derby County Chair that football is now about money). The so-called ‘beautiful game’ sold off to the highest bidder.

The end credits mixes up old footage with new again, with Bowie’s Queen Bitch playing in the background, we witness the trajectories of Revie and Clough. Revie didn’t last as England manager and ended his career under a financial cloud while Taylor/Clough took over a provincial football team called Nottingham Forest and led it to victory…..

There has been criticisms of Peace’s book which is a fictional account of a real life event (and Peace repeats this with the ‘Red Riding’ trilogy). But Peace, I don’t think, has ever said it was the truth. The art of faction has its problems, and there is a fine line, but weaving fictional and real life events together can give an exaggerated form of storytelling (certainly with Peace’s fictionalised account of real-life police corruption). I remember similar comments being made about the film 24 Hour Party People (the narrative being about the career of Tony Wilson).

Whether any of the Damned United (film and book) is true or just fiction (and the family of Brian Clough were upset by the book) but it depicts Clough as an outspoken complex man with his own obsessions.

Though I was disappointed, and whether this is true or not, that the early part in the book where Clough takes an axe to Don Revie’s desk is omitted from the film. And that would have been a powerful cinematic scene but maybe they thought it was too overkill, who knows…

Carnival of Socialism @ AVPS

carnival_of_socialism

The latest Carnival of Socialism is over at Phil’s blog. And it is very good. Especially like the graphic to advertise the Carnival.

Thankfully Phil has reminded me I am doing the next one on the 12th April.

Honestly, it felt like, ya know, yesterday when I emailed the comrades at the Carnival saying I would do one in April cos April seemed like light-years away….

Times flies….

So if there are any posts that take your fancy that you want me to include in the next Carnival or nominate your own please email me @

Louisefeminista@btinternet.com

Thanks.

People First demo

PutPeopleFirst09

More pix on my Flickr page.

I marched today as part of the People First demo protesting against the G20. Tens of thousands of people were there such as NGOs, trade unions, leftie groups, religious organisations and anyone else who is opposed to the neo-liberal project.

PutPeopleFirst09

Though I must admit the ‘Put People First’ slogan that was being chanted at the front of the march was a little lame as the ruling class does indeed put people first….rich people…

PutPeopleFirst09

The demo was kinda quiet thankfully I ended up at the sections where people were playing various musical instruments with lots of partying and dancing. Pretty much a carnival atmosphere.

PutPeopleFirst09

It was very difficult to get pix at the front of the demo as there were stewards holding rope that kept the front of the march together yet pretty hard to photograph.

PutPeopleFirst09

Why couldn’t the organisers let people take pix for around 10mins before setting off..? Strange tactics.

PutPeopleFirst09

The cops were at the front yet policing was pretty much absent as far as I could tell. Nothing like the brutal and violent policing over the Gaza demos!

PutPeopleFirst09

But the anarchists had a police escort (bless Her Maj’s Finest!) around Hyde Park. They had positioned themselves in a square shape, people at the front and people around the sides, this was probably to stop the cops indulging in snatch arrests.

PutPeopleFirst09

Overall a very good day, and I was pleased to see so many people and so many trade union banners.

PutPeopleFirst09

Patriarchy, women’s autonomy, capitalism, and all that jazz…….

feministlogo2Secondary title: Wait for the revolution, babe!

This to be honest feels like déjà vu. I have had this argument regarding patriarchy and women’s autonomy more times than I can remember. Frankly, it is getting so tedious. Why does the Left find it so difficult to accept it?

I had this debate with Mark Fischer from Weekly Worker sometime in 2004(read the archive to get a taster) and now it is happening again. Groundhog Day all over again…..this time it is a Labour Leftie writing to Briefing taking exception at my piece I wrote for the International Women’s Day edition. Unfortunately, I can’t link to it (sub only) but I can give you a flavour of the arguments. I don’t want to give a disservice to the comrade nor distort his words.

Different Leftie men…same arguments though. Fortunately, I have had this debate, like I said, many times that I can dust off my old documents written on the subject because nothing different is being put forward. Certainly, no real thought provoking analysis is being put forward.

So pardon me for being a tad tetchy about this but as a Socialist feminist these constant debates fill me with utter despair, the Left should and bloody does know better but I believe this exposes the underlining resistance and defensiveness in examining own individual behaviour. The Left is not hermetically sealed from the sexism that is reflected in patriarchal capitalism. Do men benefit from women’s oppression? Yes, indeed they do.

Comrades, lets be serious, Socialism is compatible with feminism, patriarchy exists and the Left should support women’s autonomy as this furthers the class struggle….

So after that preamble here is the letter I have written to Labour Briefing in response to the article from the comrade.

Dear Labour Briefing,

In reply to Adam Spencer’s article, Marx and women’s liberation, patriarchy is a term that covers a variety of observable social phenomena. Some of these things are difficult to slot into the categories used by Marx in Capital. An example would be sexist bosses harassing their female staff members. Furthermore violence against women and women being treated like sub-humans pre-date capitalism. By and large, women in pre-capitalist societies faced unbearable oppression. Women face sexist behaviour both on the Left and in the labour movement in general. Yet comrade Spencer says that we should ignore all this as it will be swept away come the revolution.

He argues that ‘Forms of oppression based upon gender or race are part of the superstructure of ideas that follow from the economic mode of production. Therefore women’s oppression is a consequence of class oppression and their liberation of the working class as a whole. It cannot be achieved separately’.

Firstly, I never argued in my original article that liberation can be achieved separately. I support women’s autonomy and not separatism. Unfortunately, the ideological differences between separatism and autonomy get confused, and believe me there are differences. An autonomous organisation is enabling a democratic way for women to speak for themselves about the oppression they face.

Secondly, comrade Spencer asserts that there is a hierarchy of oppression with class being at the apex while all forms of oppression are subordinate.  Furthermore comrade Spencer states, ‘However, the objective must not be women’s liberation separate from the liberation of the working class as a whole, since that is simply not possible within a Marxist framework’.

He gets things the wrong way round as to how the labour movement and the Left should relate to women’s liberation. Rather than grandly from on high decreeing that the struggle against capitalist exploitation takes precedence over even thinking about challenging other forms of oppression we should be making sure that the labour movement takes a stand against all forms of oppression.

For these reasons it is clear that Marxists should embrace the self organisation of women and other specifically oppressed groups in society.

Indeed I think Marxists should go further and have the self confidence to recognise the leadership of autonomously organised women in the struggle for women’s’ liberation.

This not to oppose the involvement of men in the struggle for women’s liberation. It should be natural for any revolutionary to wish to stand firm with any group of people fighting against the oppression they face. Indeed for the working class to ever learn how to free itself as a whole such a response must become the response of broad layers of the class.

Unfortunately, comrade Spencer does indeed come across as a ‘mechanical Marxist’ something which he didn’t wish to be characterised as.

Comradely,

Louise Whittle