
Instead of the sanitised version of injured innocence, what you’ll see is an aggressive-looking young woman – as yet unidentified – hat pulled down over her eyes, mouthing obscenities into the face of a police officer, who is trying to ignore her.
After several minutes of this he snaps and slaps her with the back of his hand with the words: “Go away.”
She doesn’t and she continues to hurl abuse. At which point he draws his baton and belts her on the legs.
If anyone ever deserved a good slap, this woman certainly did.
Instead of being suspended and investigated, I believe the officer involved should be commended for his forbearance.
So says misogynist Bill Carmichael of the Yorkshire Post, state thuggery and violence against women is totally acceptable as this woman got what she deserved. Is his next column going to argue for the return of the ‘rule of thumb’ against lippy women who step out of line?
And it seems the spin machine of the right-wing press in conjunction with the cops (and you can rely on right-wing ideologues to defend the indefensible!) are muck raking and smearing this woman.
But hey, lets not distract ourselves with a spot of cop violence lets look at the woman… and her past! And whatta shocker…she has a past!! Who doesn’t have a past, for cryin’ out loud!!!
Lets not contend ourselves by the boring details about this TSG cop not wearing his number lets distract ourselves with details of the the woman who had her hat pulled down over her eyes. Shocking! And could she have done that because…it was a sunny day… (Oh, how prosaic!).
She remonstrated with the cop, if you look at the video on youtube, the cops decided a couple of mins previously to grab a man for no reason that is what she and others were responding to. I witnessed them grab this man for no reason and that caused people to remonstrate…I saw the TSG cop grab another woman seconds before, he was intent on punching her as well! Carmichael would undoubtedly believe she deserved a beating too!!!
Why did they grab this man? Instead of asking that question, this woman is portrayed as some anti-establishment layabout (see the Mail for their brand of ‘reportage’). She is the thug, she is the threat, an extremist, a terrorist. The cop was only doing what was expected, in the right-wing ideologue’s eyes.
But then with the ever widening of the definition of ‘extremism’ and ‘terrorism’ under NL anyone who protests is one, speaks out is one, therefore we are all …terrorists.
Again, as the cops have experienced dire PR during the past couple of weeks the right-wing will strike back. Expect more smears and hype against anyone who has the audacity to speak out and/or complain about police violence.
(HatTip: Indymedia)
April 19, 2009 at 3:27 pm |
These newspaper comments show no appreciation for one of the most basic tenets of liberal democracy – the rule of law. No matter what the woman did, the police have no right to dispense punishment, certainly not the sort of physical punishment being encouraged by those commentators.
April 19, 2009 at 3:35 pm |
How come such a fascistic view can be held by someone so senior in the British Press?
Oh. Silly me.
April 19, 2009 at 4:26 pm |
oh god. the language he’s used to couch his arguement says it all really. way to promote institutionalised violence against women.
April 19, 2009 at 4:35 pm |
Indeed, if a woman ‘gives you lip’ then slap her! That is what misogynist Carmichael saying. Well, he probably still supports the rule of thumb.
April 19, 2009 at 4:44 pm |
Funny how these rightwhingers were up in arms when the countryside alliance got a battering from the Met a few years back!
If anything, this whole affair has exposed the right’s hypocrisy for all to see. No wonder Tory central office have kept mum about it.
April 19, 2009 at 6:01 pm |
So if a copper in full Judge Dread riot gear who’s looking for a ruck gives me lip, am I allowed to do likewise? Or is it all one-way traffic?
In fact, the copper who yelled at me and tried to intimidate me recently … lucky I had good manners and smiled sweetly throughout his tirade. Or maybe my even temper and equanimity (LOL!) now earns a “good slap”. As opposed to a bad slap, one assumes.
April 19, 2009 at 6:48 pm |
The cops are utter bastards. They can intimidate, abuse, beat the crap out of people and kill as well yet they get away with it time and f-ing time again…
Madam Miaow, hope you were ok after your experience with b’stard cop?!
April 20, 2009 at 11:54 am |
Perhaps this cop had read the CIA memos, I hope his fingers were spread and he didn’t ‘invade the individual’s personal space’ but remembered ‘the purpose of the facial slap is to induce shock, surprise, and or humiliation.’ Can’t wait for public waterboarding down Pall Mall, bet tickets would sell out faster then a Michael Paedophile Jackson gig!
April 20, 2009 at 12:59 pm |
earwicga: I am sure the cops have their own ‘How to beat the crap out of people without leaving too many marks’. But they probably have a Vol 2 called, ‘If you leave marks and/or kill someone this is your defence and knowing the State they will cover it up for you’….
But the cops do have a manual on behaviour, supposedly.
April 20, 2009 at 1:36 pm |
Harpy, Volume 1 is the one that domestic abusers have down pat. Watching that video took me back – it was an automatic reflex that I have seen far too many times.
April 20, 2009 at 5:13 pm |
earwicga: And the police, in a case of DV, told a husband how to hit his female partner ‘without leaving bruises etc’… I suppose from one powerful violent cowardly bully to another powerful violent cowardly bully.
April 20, 2009 at 7:20 pm |
I was trying to say DV and police officers aren’t mutually exclusive – I would say quite a high prevalence, but we would never know would we!