So the Tory won in Norwich North. No surprise there, but certainly an own goal committed by Gordon Brown getting rid of a popular MP like Ian Gibson. I agree with Susan Press on this especially the point about how the constituency Labour Party supported Gibson (the Chair resigned as well, and seems like many LP activists refused to canvass for imposed LP candidate Chris Ostrowski, who, apparently has swine flu…….!!) and so did Hazel Blears have the ‘support’ of her CLP yet….. the LP NEC decided to refuse Gibson the right to run again at the next election hence his decision to quit now…hence the by-election… But Blears is in the clear….
So to me it looks distinctly like double-standards, why has Blears got away with being allowed to stand again at the next election while Gibson was stopped? When it comes to the expenses scandal …. Blears was up to her neck in it… yet the NEC made an example, a sacrifice more like, of Ian Gibson. What he did regarding his expenses wasn’t exactly clever but there was far far worse behaviour (yes, Hazel….I mean you!)
Why not Blears and/or the others (including ministers) who have seemingly got away with their pilfering and flipping?? Instead the NEC made a couple of examples just to show willing and as Susan argues (asking the question if Labour loses the by-election):
…then maybe it is time for Labour activists to mount a campaign questioning why a Labour rebel was singled out for the slaughter- and why others remain in office.
Quite!!
Btw there was an excellent article regarding Norwich North and Ian Gibson in the latest Labour Brieifing (sub only).
Oh, and ….
Craig Murray (Put an Honest Man into Parliament): 953
Posted by harpymarx 






