Political meme

August 31, 2009

I have been tagged by AVPS about political experiences and so on. So here it is……

First political experience Quite a few to choose from…but this one stands out for me. My dad was on strike during the winter of discontent. He was arguing with my mum about wanting to go back to work. Why this specific argument stuck in my mind (I was around 9 years old at the time) was my mum’s response. She responded to my dad’s desire to scab by saying that if he did then what would other workers think, and that it was important for ‘people to stick together’ and that going back to work would only benefit the employers. Looking back, she was right. He stayed out on strike. Her words made an impact on me, raised my own consciousness about the world. I had never heard her again get so angry about workers’ rights and collective action, and it was totally out of character for her. Maybe she was influenced (though she never admitted it) by her dad, my grandfather, who was a committed trade unionist and organiser.

First vote In 1988, I think. I definitely voted Labour.

First demo Anti-apartheid demo in B’ham sometime in late 1985 early 1986. Can’t recall where we marched to. But it was an excellent day.

Last vote Yes, European elections this year and I voted Green….. That was a big deal for me as I had always voted Labour.

Last political activity Well, I attended the Climate Camp this weekend, and the other week was part of the memorial/vigil to remember Sean Rigg who died in police custody at Brixton police station.

I don’t usually tag but hey, it is a Bank Holiday so I shall pick Splintered Sunrise, Madam Miaow and Random Blowe.

And if it takes your fancy then go for it……


The butler did it: crime fiction and police procedural shows

August 31, 2009

Slumped on the sofa flicking through the channels I happened upon an old episode of Kojak. It reminded me of what is missing from majority of recent police procedural/crime programmes and that is social and political context. The dialogue was hard boiled Chandler-esque, gritty realistic cinematography, no emphasis on youthful leads just ordinary looking people who can…funnily enough…act and with a storyline that powerfully exposed police brutality and institutionalised racism. Oh, those were the days of political consciousness and awareness. I suppose the only current contender for the social/political in crime writing is The Wire (stupidly being shown at the graveyard shift time on BBC2). And that popular culture phenomenon has entered the psyche  of Tory Chris Grayling, who, misses the point big time, no surprise there .

Fast forward on nearly 40 years and crime/police prodedural programmes (both UK and USA) are entirely slick in production, the actors reflect the obsession with youth and the script never really stretches the imagination nor thinking beyond the limits. The denounment is presented usually where all the strands are neatly pulled and tied together, where everything has been explained in that Hercule Poirot manner. Though there are story arcs yet they too are finally tied together in a nice clean bow.

And many of these crime/police procedural series; Morse, Lewis, Midsommer Murders, Wire in the Blood, CSI, The Mentalist, Criminal Minds, Cold Case, The Bill….are places where you wouldn’t want to visit as the death toll is high (Midsommer… Oxford…) and where the characters in many of these series are insulated from the real world and where the crime(s) are shown as a case of ‘individual wickedness’. And with newer programmes like The Mentalist and Criminal Minds the stories hinge on, usually, a lead quirky and damaged character who can ‘read’ a person’s non-verbal communication and see inside their ‘criminal’ minds by scientifically classifying and labelling behaviour, traits and characteristics through the art of profiling. They are allowed to make mistakes; trial and error but again, this reliance on a composite of characteristics neatly delivers the criminal.

On one level these programmes are entertaining (indeed I enjoy watching them myself I especially like Numb3rs produced by Ridley and Tony Scott along with Cold Case and Without a Trace) and do contain the usual plot devices and characterisation that engage the viewer but many lack depth and an underlying lack of a social/political context, some do briefly but it is done fleetingly.

Much of crime fiction tends to rely on the individual and skirts a around social/political context, again many crime fiction writers have different writing styles, some more engaging in their language than others, characterisation, dramatic tension and identification. Yet it still comes back to the individual criminal though one writer who defies that trend, and possibly through his own knowledge of the criminal justice system,  is Dexter Dias who writes about civil liberties, police corruption and racism constructed within a crime fiction framework.

What makes a criminal? Someone who fits the everyday definition of a criminal is someone who deals with their own comparative powerlessness by victimising those who are even more powerless than his or herself. Crime generally reflects the power structures in society.

The crimes of the powerful are legitimised while those of the powerless are punished. Take a kickback from a bribe to a Saudi official, launch an illegal war,  trade in illegally logged timber or in goods produced by child labour and you are likely to prosper afterward. Sell drugs on the street, burgle a house  or just be young male and Black and you are likely to go to prison.


Introducing the DWP customer charter

August 31, 2009

Remember James Purnell? He of former Secretary of State for Work and Pensions. Becoming clearer…ah yes, Purnell. Flipping infamy… Now off to his ivory tower to re-visit, re-write, re-tune and revise New Labour. Pretty much to recycle NL.

Way back to yonder days when Purnell was strutting his stuff by attacking claimants he had a bright idea (light bulb shines at a 40 watt glow).

During the second reading of the Welfare Reform Bill he said he was prepared to look at a charter setting out the rights that those claiming welfare benefits and accessing employment services can expect.

The Charter sets out the DWP’s commitment to -

‘… give you the right information, making it clear what you can expect from us and what your responsibilities are in return …’

- and that -

  • We will do our best to help you, listen to you and make sure you feel comfortable dealing with us.
  • We want you to have confidence in our decisions. If the outcome is not what you hoped for, we will explain why and tell you what will happen next.
  • We will deal with you as quickly as we can. We will tell you how long we will take and do our best to keep to the time we have said.
  • We will make sure you can contact us in ways that are simple and easy to understand. We will tell you about other services that may help you.

Bog standard stuff really, similar to other ‘customer charters’ that explains commitments in delivery of services of what should be happening. The problem is that there’s a high turn over of frontline staff, very basic training and lack of resources. Just highlights how much NL sees the importance of delivering welfare benefits and it is a highly skilled undertaking.

So much so they produce a basic A5 leaflet outlining commitments that should happen anyway, it is an empty gesture outlining meaningless rhetoric. And I see they throw in their favourite word, ‘responsibilities’..the problem with that word used under NL is that it has been politicised i.e. the onus on the powerless.


In the Realm of the Senses

August 30, 2009

Realm

“In the Realm of the Senses shows the tragic consequences of individual resistance to a culture that denies freedom and thwarts human fulfilment.” (In the Realm of the Senses: BFI Film Classics, Joan Mellen)

I wrote before about seeing the film In the Realm of the Senses way back in 1991 when it was awarded a classification in the UK. Funny how times move on, ideas and views shift and change. I was trying to recall how I reacted when I originally saw the controversial film, think what was memorable for me was the mass exodus of people from the cinema, proved to be distraction. But what struck me now as then was the sexual intimacy along with the film’s central theme, sexual obsession but also the position of women in pre-war Japanese society. Oshima wanted to make a porn film but In the Realm is not your average porno. It has a  many layered and faceted narrative. Not the usual mechanical screwing, bump and grind, tits and ass, meat and money shots.

I had seen films with full frontal nudity and sex (simulated and unsimulated), but there’s always this demarcation between erotica and porn. Erotica is posited as something acceptable within the boundaries of taste while porn is trangressive, obscene and degrading. The two words are interchangable and what is one person’s porn is anothers erotica. Vice versa. I don’t want to get bogged down with definitions and interpreting porn, but pornography can be viewed in the realm of fantasy and the imagination, whether consciously or unconsciously, and not understood as a literal truth. And yes, pornography degrades and objectifies women, a further expression of sexual commodification under patriarchal capitalism and part of the continuum of women’s oppression. But I believe you also need to look beyond the superficiality and understand the contradictory nature of sex, sexual desire and fantasy, and how this is intertwined with the power relationships between men and women.

Anyway…on with the film..which involves two characters, Sada and Kichizo (shortened to Kichi). Their first meeting, the frisson of attraction and tension through the act of voyeurism. The relationship intensifies where Kichizo rejects his wife for Sada, he goes beyond the boundaries of acceptable marital sex. Indeed the couple transgress against the dominant hegemonic system. Once ensconced in their sexual world they hear that in the real world they are depicted as ‘perverts’ mainly because of Sada’s enjoyment of sex.

Linda Williams in her book Screening Sex (chapter on ‘Hardcore eroticism’)refers to Oshima’s influence of the shunga (between 17th and 19th century depictions of sexually graphic and explicit imagery) which she argues goes against the ‘clinical conventions of Western hardcore porn’. Yet at the same time Oshima uses aspects of Western porn techniques such as close-ups of genitalia, and of penetrative and oral sex. The visual saturation of red while the couple have sex is powerful, overwhelming and exudes the feeling of claustrophobia. At the beginning of their relationship Kichizo is Sada’s employer but once the sexual encounters have been established an odd kind of equality between the two develops. Kichizo seems to be devoted in exploring Sada’s sexual desires and fantasises. Sada’s sexuality is central and not suborbinate to Kichizo. Her desires are phallocentric yet she takes the lead in their orgasmic desires and pleasures, she literally is on top.

Their life revolves around continuous sex, in all sensual and sexual states, indeed in the realm of the senses, whether tasting the period blood of Sada or savouring the food  fused with the vaginal juices of Sada. Nothing is taboo. It also defies the usual patriarchal paradigm of a woman’s sexuality.

The film could have finished with the doomed lovers both committing suicide or indeed it is the transgressive woman who is ‘punished’ by death. Yet In the Realm turns that depiction upside down.

 The film is uncomfortable and unnerving to watch ( scenes of violence) such as the scenes where Sada prostitutes herself to make money so that she and Kichi can live out their sexual world, both seem ambivalent in what Sada does, neither lectures or moralise each other. Yet it is of a contradictory nature as Sada strives for a liberated free world but shackles herself to the confines of exploitation to live with Kichi.

I think the pivotal scene in the film, and upon which hinges the final violent shocking inevitable climatic denouement is Kichi walking past, hunched up, a group of soldiers marching through the town while women wave flags which signals a massive political upsurge in Japanese society that hurtles towards Fascism. Kichi is dressed in traditional garb while the soldiers are dressed militarily. This is the reality of 1936 when the film is set. It is as if Kichi comes face to face with the society outside of his affair with Sada and knows that he no longer wishes to live life outside in a world of repression and cruelty.

When the film was released it courted controversy, censorship and prosecution ( was charged with obscenity in Japan circa 1977). At the New York Film Festival it was seized by customs. The film didn’t receive a classification until 1991 in the UK.

In understanding In the Realm, Linda Williams argues that no narrative film had ever come close to the literary tradition of hardcore eroticism. And that the film served as a ‘benchmark’ for later directors that there are many possible ways of getting graphic as movies open up the questions of the imagination of sex beyond the familiar formulas of soft and hard.

Further reading:

Linda Williams – Screening Sex. The chapter on In the Realm of the Senses (comparing it to Last Tango in Paris) references Foucault and Bataille in examining sex and sexuality. Fascinating chapter as with the whole of the book.

Joan Mellen’s BFI Film Classics. In the Realm of the Senses gives an excellent intricate analysis of the film along with a biographical account of its director, Oshima Nagisa, and the history of the film post-release with its trials, controversies and tribulations.

Mark Kermode on In the Realm of James Ferman


My visit to the Climate Camp today

August 29, 2009

ClimateCamp0809

My initial impressions….

Spent a couple of hours at the Climate Camp at Blackheath Common. Hoping to go back there Monday. It was such a friendly and warm environment.

ClimateCamp0809

On arrival, you are welcomed and shown to the main tent where there’s a quick talk about how the climate operates and there’s a tour as well, along with a handbook. Very well organised and self-sufficient.

ClimateCamp0809

I couldn’t stay for that long and sorry I missed the workshop Kevin was involved in (hope it went well btw). There was lots of workshops and other activities, even a tiny cinema tent!!

ClimateCamp0809

The camp is based on collective decision making processes that is very positive. Also, the backdrop of Blackheath Common is the capitalist colony known as Canary Wharf.

ClimateCamp0809

The cops were keeping a low profile, there were vans further up the Common on the other side along with a massive crane with a CCTV camera perched on top…

Day of the Triffids

Day of the Triffids

Workshops on Monday includes ones on feminism and Workers’ Climate Action.

ClimateCamp0809

And it was a wonderfully warm sunny day as well…..

ClimateCamp0809

Will be back on Monday to sample the political debates….


Gay icons

August 29, 2009

petertatchell

I found the exhibition on Gay Icons interesting but I was not  wildly enthusiastic. The selection came from 10 rather respectable establishment friendly lesbians and gay men. Yes, they chose a cross section of icons from the conservative to the radical, including race, sex and class. Instead of picking the famous to choose their icons what about ordinary LGBT grassroots activists being asked who they regard as inspirational and/or as an icon? Even with an exhibition like this the people doing the choosing are supposedly exemplars of the ‘great and good’ and of the famous.

Actually in saying all of that, some of the icons chosen I admire as well. Peter Tatchell though I find his politics hit and miss, I have immense respect and admiration for his election campaign in Bermondsey 1983 and for his continued fight against oppression. I remember at the time, reading about the appalling homophobic crap he was facing not just from the tabloids but from the Labour Party. He made a personal impression on my own burgeoning political consciousness especially as I grew up in a narrow minded, inflexible, homophobic, oppressive household . Tatchell’s politics were a breath of fresh air.

I admired the man and his politics appealed to me. I was 13 at the time of the ‘83 election and hoped Tatchell would win. But it was stacked against him. My only regret was never writing to him expressing my respect and admiration for him.

Other icons in this exhibition who I admire because of their spirit, political radicalism, bravery, courage of convictions, include Audre Lorde, Sojourner Truth, Harvey Milk Quentin Crisp, Patrica Highsmith, Alan Turing, Virginia Woolf, Benjamin Britten, WH Auden, Maya Angelou.


Nice day out part deux

August 28, 2009

Across the Thames

Spent a nice day aimlessly wandering around the Big Smoke. Eventually finding myself at the Gay Icons exhibition at the National Portrait Gallery (more about that to follow).

Across the Thames

Had a nice walk around the Southbank with camera. Started out sunny then the sky turned grey, heavens opened up and it rained.

Oh well.

Weird wacky acid trippy like reflection off subglasses....

Weird wacky acid trippy like reflection off subglasses....

Life in the real world…freaky Frank Field is a leading a rebellion. Well I never!


Insurance industry and the state

August 27, 2009

So the insurance industry should have a greater role in helping people deal with unemployment and ill-health.  Apparently, action is needed to reduce burden on the State, says Working Group.

Furthermore, there should be a greater role for the insurance industry in helping people deal with risks such as unemployment and ill-health, the Insurance Industry Working Group, co-chaired by Chancellor of the Exchequer Alistair Darling, along with Andrew Moss, Group Chief Executive of Aviva.

In ‘Vision for the insurance industry in 2020′, the Working Group moans that there is evidence that many people are not saving enough for their needs and do not have sufficient insurance to cover them against the risks they face, and that both these trends place a burden on the State, by increasing the need for benefit payments.

The Government currently provides around 64 per cent of the UK’saddressable ‘risk management’ market for individual and occupational pensions, healthcareand long term care and income protection funded through tax and national insurance on a ‘pay as you go’ basis.

 And they further whimper that over time, the challenge of funding these costs will rise, due, for example, to a decline in the relative size of the working age population, and that this raises the question of where the optimal balance between private and state provision should lie in the future and how much emphasis should be placed on personal responsibility.

Oh yes, personal responsibility….. here we go…again.

‘More can be done’, they exclaim regarding the insurance industry.

Where it is commercially viable’, to act in partnership with the government to explore whether private sector solutions could be helpful in areas of social insurance.

The document is available here.

What is all this about? I mean, in the words of Stewie Griffin, what the deuce..?

Perhaps the state retirement pension scheme is worth thinking about. £70 billion each year paid out to pensioners with very little in the way of administrative cost.

It is run by junior and middle level civil servants based in the North East of England (i.e. they don’t even get London weighting).Very cost effective. Not perfect. It does not pay out much but then you don’t pay in much in the form of national insurance contributions. Women get a raw deal from it but that can be dealt with relatively easily by the appropriate use of credits for maternity and carer breaks. In fact this already happens to a limited extent now. These remedies could be introduced with little disturbance to the general nature of the scheme or to it’s administration.

Of course the problem with all this as your unfriendly local neo-liberal will point out is…no one is getting rich out of al this! 5% of GNP and not a millionaire in sight!

If the benefit system, the health service, social services and social housing are added up along with more minor components of the welfare state such as legal aid are added up and you have a nice juicy target of several hundred billion…lots of lots of bonuses  (bonii if you are D Cameron Esq) for those who like to rob the poor to give to the rich.

Just finally…Separate though connected,  Serco (that private company with its grubby paws in lots of financial pies) has made a massive profit. Now there’s a surprise….


Interview with Sarah Learmouth – CRASAC

August 25, 2009

I interviewed Sarah Learmouth (CRASAC) for the women’s issue of this month’s Labour Briefing.  Also please see the EDM as well. Thank-you Sarah for spending time in answering my questions. In solidarity and sisterhood.

 1. Can you tell me what work CRASAC does?

CRASAC stands for Coventry Rape and Sexual Abuse Centre. We are an independent charity and are also a member of the Rape Crisis Network. CRASAC  provides a combination of a telephone helpline, counselling and advocacy services to help victims who want to report to the Criminal Justice System. We work with women, men and children from the age of 11 and support approximately 3,000 victims per year, of whom around 25% are children. CRASAC also trains 20 volunteers per year, a significant number of whom are survivors of rape or abuse, many of whom, after working with us as volunteers, go on to paid work for the first time following their attack. A key aim is also to locally raise awareness of the myths and stereotypes around rape and abuse via presentations and press articles,  to challenge the lack of understanding around the impact of sexual violence and to let local people know what support is available to them and how to access it.

 

2. Funding is a major problem regarding Rape Crisis centres, how has this impacted on your organisation?

CRASAC are one of the lucky centres, we have a 4 year contract with our local authority and PCT which covers around a third of our basic costs. Unfortunately the remainder comes from various grants and funding applications that are for as little as 6 to 12 months duration. Our staff works with the constant knowledge that if we are not able to obtain new funding, they will be made redundant. The loss of funds would impact on all parts of our service, for example in our counselling service waiting lists can reduce or increase rapidly from a 6 week wait, to 6
 months or more if we lose a counsellor. The remaining two thirds of our income is from 4 other sources and we are
constantly applying for funding where we can. There is no funding to pay for a fundraiser.

 

3. There is an EDM in Parliament about the funding crisis, what responses have you received?

From bloggers, social networks, supporters i.e. the general public, an unfailingly positive response. Many people have written to their MP’s to request that they sign but to date only 50 MP’s have signed up, including only 1 Conservative MP, despite the fact that their stated intention is to give Rape Crisis Centres stable 3 year funding.
We have had MP’s responses to constituents forwarded to us confirming they fully support our work, but will not sign up either because the EDM does not have the amount we need detailed or because they believe it will only have a limited effect. Unfortunately they do not suggest alternative methods for us to raise this issue.

 

 4. I was reading the key findings in the report, The Crisis in Rape  Crisis, and they make grim reading: Eight organisations had no funding secured for 2008 and 69% were ‘unsustainable’ in the future. What demands you are making on the government regarding funding?

The Rape Crisis Network (England and Wales) have been in discussions with the Government for years requesting just £50,000 per Rape Crisis Centre per  year, as yet with no success. We believe there is some confusion over
who should take on responsibility for funding roles. The danger is that Central Government believe this funding is a local government issue and  vice versa. To put the amount in context, the Home Office puts the cost of
EACH RAPE at £76,000. A significant problem is that funding that Central Government states is
for sexual violence is not ring-fenced and Local Strategic Partnerships have a number of issues to deal with. Sometimes people wrongly believe that funding domestic violence is funding sexual violence, they are
related in that in approximately 80% of domestic violence cases there is sexual violence, but this is not the case for victims of sexual violence. Only 25% of our clients have been raped or abused within a domestic violence setting and CRASAC only deals with sexual violence victims.

5. Rape Crisis centres are a vital lifeline to many women who have been raped, and your continuing work is of immense value for women to get practical help and support, a safe place where women are listened to. And especially as you manage on a shoestring budget and rely on volunteers. Shamefully there are  50% less rape crisis centres now than in 1985.  How do you perceive the future?

In the current economic climate and with the lack of real, sustained funding commitment from Westminster the immediate, future will be very tough. It is of real concern that as funding opportunities constrict,
there will be more voluntary sector agencies applying for the same pots of money.

 The moral argument for our services has been won, our excellent performance and value for money statistics are clearly illustrated with central and local government, we believe that to change things we must talk in terms of obligations and rights based on a combination of basic human rights, the Gender Equality Duty and the UN’s Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination Against Women. To this end we
are working with the Women’s Resource Centre in London on research designed to give women’s voluntary organizations a blueprint for successfully influencing their local priorities.

6. Fawcett Society recently published research that highlighted that it is  a postcode lottery when it comes to rape victims accessing justice. What are your views on that?

The facts speak for themselves. 90% of Rape Crisis clients don’t report their rape, of the 10% that do there is an 80% attrition rate, leaving a small minority left in the Criminal Justice System. Our conviction rate is appalling, the worst in Europe with the exception of Southern Ireland. Rape should be treated with the same professionalism as other serious violent crimes, it is a national scandal that rape victims face a culture of disbelief and delayed responses that can lead to a withdrawal from the Criminal Justice System.

7. Do you believe that the public perception and attitudes  towards rape (including the police and the courts) have worsened; are the myths and stereotypes surrounding sexual violence still widespread?

The long answer – the Fawcett Society released a report in May 2009 on women and the Criminal Justice System, ‘Engendering Justice – from Policy to Practice’. It found that the system is institutionally sexist and Baroness Jean Corston commented, “Evidence has demonstrated that throughout the criminal justice system female offenders, female victims of crime and women workers continue to face discrimination in a system
 designed for men by men.”

“Attitudes and expectations as to how a ‘proper victim’ should behave continue to shape the criminal justice system response. Women who are victims of violence, particularly sexual violence are often made to
 feel like the perpetrator rather than the victim. There have been some commendable policy developments, particularly by the Crown Prosecution Service, but practices and attitudes continue to act as a roadblock to
effective implementation.”

The short answer – one in four people still believe that a woman is partially responsible for being raped if she is drunk and one in three think she is partially responsible if she flirted heavily with the manbeforehand.
(http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/documents/violence-against-women-poll) Our own experience within Coventry is that we see the prevalence of these myths and stereotypes impacting negatively on our clients on a daily basis.

 8. What practical support can we show in supporting and highlighting
 your campaign around funding?

1.       Write to your MP expressing your astonishment that Rape Crisis Centres are in such dire financial straits and asking them to confirm their support by signing our EDM.

 2.       Write to your local councillor expressing a similar view and asking what specialized support there is locally for victims of sexual violence.
 

3.       Ask the chair of your local Crime Disorder Reduction Partnership (CDRP) for a Gender Impact Assessment on their lack of funding to victims of sexual violence.

 4.       Copy each of the letters to all of your local papers.

5.       If you are looking for a charity to raise money for then get in touch with your local Rape Crisis Centre (www.rapecrisis.org.uk) and they will be delighted to have your support.

6.       Join their Facebook and Twitter groups and retweet or pass on their news and information – remember they have no funds for marketing or PR.

That’s probably enough for now!


Evolutionary psychology, gender and whether pink stinks……

August 25, 2009

I have been reading these posts on the F Word blog with interest and fascination. Yes, the offensive ’scientific’ discipline known as evolutionary psychology rearing its reactionary head. 

One name symbolic to evolutionary psychology is the misogynist and Nazis supporting Konrad Lorenz. Indeed he had political and ideological axes to grind that propped up his so-called scientific evidence.

Will be dusting off the feminist texts refuting evolutinary psychology along with the excellent book Alas, Poor Darwin to write more on this subject.

In the meantime I shall leave you with why I like pink (more about personal choice than innate wiring as a female…. or to do with the social constructionism and conditioning around traditional gender roles…)