It is this time of year I start to see the shock of red poppies. What does the red poppy represent? What does Remembrance represent? As a kid growing up I was very aware of this particular day, the living room wall would be festooned with bright red poppies combined with the other military regalia. And pride of place was the medal my brother received for ‘bravery’ for service in the north of Ireland. Remembrance Day was a big deal in my house, and when I was a kid I wore my red poppy with pride.
But as time went on and I grew up, my political consciousness kicked in and I started to question Remembrance Day and the symbolism of the red poppy. I used to become transfixed by my brother’s war medal hanging on the wall where the in-laws and relatives would gawp at with national pride. Eventually I exclaimed, ‘How much blood is on that medal’? I think my mother thought I was being literal in that statement but once she understood what I meant it culminated in her shouting and lecturing me about the importance of what my brother did. I refused to wear the red poppy as it symbolised imperialism and colonialism; past, present and future wars. Selective remembrance based on the establishment’s terms. Elected war criminals standing at the Cenotaph representing jingoism and “our boys” mentality.
During those years living at home I started to wear a white poppy but I became dissatisfied with that. At this time of year I don’t wear any poppy of any kind. As I wrote last year around this time:
The glorification of war symbolic with the red poppy. Who are we remembering? Working class young people sent off to do the bidding of imperialism and ending up as canon fodder? War can shape political ideas, WW1 certainly shaped the political consciousness of my grandfather who realised he had been sold a lie and had been fighting a futile war where thousands died on the battlefields.
What about the victims of imperialism and colonialism? From Aden, Mau-Mau uprising, Korea, Vietnam, Ireland, Malvinas, Chile, East Timor, Afghanistan and Iraq…. and so on and so on? What about the war crimes committed in Fallujah, Haditha, Bloody Sunday…and so on and so on?
And with Remembrance we have the bourgeois acceptable and sentimental poetry of Lawrence Binyen and Rupert Brooke with their heroic glorification of the soldier. While Siegfried Sassoon and Wilfred Owen saw the brutal realities of war and the battlefield, they tried to counteract the pro-war propaganda being churned out at the time. Somehow, I can’t imagine Anthem for a Doomed Youth being read out.
WWI psychologically damaged my grandfather, one of a generation of people scarred by that futile and barbaric war. He suffered from ‘shell-shock’ which in 21st century terms means post-traumatic stress disorder. He would turn to alcohol as a way of dealing with the trauma that continued to dog him throughout his life. He never spoke about his experiences instead he would stare into the fire and silently cry. My mother as a kid caught him crying, she asked him what was wrong he replied that she wouldn’t want to know. Again, this reflects a time when the ‘done thing’ was to keep trauma and pain bottled up tightly and to search for a remedy and that remedy was booze, an instant way to ‘forget’ the horrors of warfare. On a positive side my grandfather, who before the war had no interest in politics, became an organised trade unionist, the subject of war politicised him. My grandfather objected to my brother signing up to join the army in the early 70s. Why he asked, ‘it is not as if you are being conscripted’. My grandfather died in 1972, I was 2 years old, never consciously met him though my mother used to say he would sing to me as a baby…the standing joke was that he sang ‘The Red Flag’ to me and that became ingrained in my psyche. My brother made a political choice to sign – up, one which damaged him by turning him into a violent and screwed-up man. The five years he spent turned into something I rarely like to think about as I experienced the full throttle of his misery and anger. Yet he was a foot soldier for imperialism, firing plastic bullets into crowds on the streets of Belfast. My brother wallowed in his own self-pity and never once recognised his role as a soldier propping up imperialism by being part of an occupying force. Even after all these years I have great difficulty in coming to terms with what my brother did on a personal level to me as there is a residue of anger. On a political level it is far easier to reject what my brother did. I loathed what he did and still do.
I apologise if this seems deeply personal but after so many years I still find it hard to grapple with my conflicting emotions and deal with the anger and pain. And this time of year brings those jarring emotions to the surface along with bringing into focus the whole brutality, violence, hypocrisy and vileness of warfare.
So here’s Dulce et Decorum est by Wilfred Owen:
Bent double, like old beggars under sacks,
Knock-kneed, coughing like hags, we cursed through sludge,
Till on the haunting flares we turned our backs
And towards our distant rest began to trudge.
Men marched asleep. Many had lost their boots
But limped on, blood-shod. All went lame; all blind;
Drunk with fatigue; deaf even to the hoots
Of tired, outstripped Five-Nines that dropped behind.
Gas! Gas! Quick, boys!-An ecstasy of fumbling,
Fitting the clumsy helmets just in time;
But someone still was yelling out and stumbling
And flound’ring like a man in fire or lime…
Dim, through the misty panes and thick green light,
As under a green sea, I saw him drowning.
In all my dreams, before my helpless sight,
He plunges at me, guttering, choking, drowning.
If in some smothering dreams you too could pace
Behind the wagon that we flung him in,
And watch the white eyes writhing in his face,
His hanging face, like a devil’s sick of sin;
If you could hear, at every jolt, the blood
Come gargling from the froth-corrupted lungs,
Obscene as cancer, bitter as the cud
Of vile, incurable sores on innocent tongues,-
My friend, you would not tell with such high zest
To children ardent for some desperate glory,
The old Lie: Dulce et decorum est
Pro patria mori.
October 26, 2009 at 7:03 pm |
Wow. I’ve never worn a poppy before, but if not wearing one puts me in a group with people like you, I’ll damn well buy one this year.
It is PRECISELY because war is so pointless and scarring that setting aside some time to contemplate it is so vital. To wear the poppy is in no way to endorse imperialism, colonialism or jingoism. It’s exactly the opposite: We remember the fallen, remember WHY they fell, and resolve never to let it come to that again. The poppy doesn’t glorify war, it mourns it.
I thought everyone understood that.
You come across in this post like an angsty teenage rebel railing against things he hasn’t fully understood. I suggest you take a good hard look at yourself, and reflect that it is possible to honour the memory of the dead without glorifying the thing that killed them.
October 26, 2009 at 11:52 pm |
Harpy Marx, thanks for this post! I don’t live in London, but I do know about the gathering at the Cenotaph on Remembrance Sunday. In the US, the elected officials usually do their “honoring” at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier in Washington. Don’t know if you’ve seen this essay by Chris Hedges about war memorials and remembering: “Celebrating Slaughter: War and Collective Amnesia.”
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20091005_celebrating_slaughter_war_and_collective_amnesia/
“War memorials are quiet, still, reverential and tasteful. And, like church, such sanctuaries are important, but they allow us to forget that these men and women were used and often betrayed by those who led the nation into war. The memorials do not tell us that some always grow rich from large-scale human suffering. They do not explain that politicians play the great games of world power and stoke fear for their own advancement. They forget that young men and women in uniform are pawns in the hands of cynics…”
and this: “A war memorial that attempted to depict the reality of war would be too subversive. It would condemn us and our capacity for evil. It would show that the line between the victim and the victimizer is razor-thin, that human beings, when the restraints are cut, are intoxicated by mass killing, and that war, rather than being noble, heroic and glorious, obliterates all that is tender, decent and kind. It would tell us that the celebration of national greatness is the celebration of our technological capacity to kill. It would warn us that war is always morally depraved, that even in “good” wars such as World War II all can become war criminals. We dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The Nazis ran the death camps. But this narrative of war is unsettling. It does not create a collective memory that serves the interests of those who wage war and permit us to wallow in self-exaltation.”
October 27, 2009 at 12:51 am |
Thanks for that Jay.
October 27, 2009 at 7:57 pm |
Hi
I thought your post was honest heartfelt and shows you to be a truly decent person.
I will be wearing a poppy. In memory of the men who didn’t make it out of my father’s Lancaster as well as for the countless people who died while wanting no part in the war.
The left are quick with the rhetoric of fighting fascism but often seem a little shy of respecting those that actually did it. My father saw some terrible things as a POW in Germany and died early as a result of the stresses. I thank him every day for the life that I and my daughter now have. I have days where I feel useless compared to the poeple who fought the Nazis and days where I’m so grateful I’ve never had to do aything like it.
It reminds me of some lines from the Manics:
Bullets for your brain today
But we’ll forget it all again
Monuments put from pen to paper
Turns me into a gutless wonder
Gravity keeps my head down
Or is it maybe shame
At being so young and being so vain
Our nation was instrumental in defeating fascism and we should be thankful to all those who played a part in doing so (and those from other nationalities too, of course), in whatever way we feel most appropriate.
October 27, 2009 at 9:23 pm |
Cheers Ken, thanks for the kind words…
October 28, 2009 at 5:16 am |
[...] is the original post: Why I won't wear a poppy « Harpymarx Share and [...]
October 29, 2009 at 11:15 am |
I’ll be wearing a poppy myself. I don’t make a big thing of it, I don’t heroize soldiers and I don’t like that the money goes to the Royal British Legion. I dislike that people like Tony Blair and David Cameron can defend war whilst wearing their poppies.
But I’ve always felt that some personal act of commemoration is in order for all of those who died in our wars, and those who were ruined by them. Because whatever my feelings about the British occupation of Ireland, or Northern Ireland, I am truly sorry that these boys were ever forced to endure what they did.
October 30, 2009 at 3:08 pm |
The Royal British Legion has apparently accepted money from the BNP. Oh dear. =[
http://kirkunity.blogspot.com/2009/10/couples-poppy-protest-against-bnp.html
October 30, 2009 at 7:16 pm |
Very good post, I come from a Family that fought for and against British Imperialism. My mother’s brother who survived the first world war in a British uniform, was murdered by those in British uniforms in 1920, there will be no poppy getting worn him. He must of been very much like your own Grandfather. As for your big brother, I wouldn’t carry any of his guilt; from what you tell us he must be carry enough of his own. Its great to hear an English man like you, its people like you who change the world, if ever you would like to visit Ireland, I’m sure we could find room in the house and give you a bit of grub! Whenever you like to come give me a shout!
October 31, 2009 at 11:17 pm |
[...] sequel what have we done to Pakistan? Analysis by Muhammad Idrees Ahmad. And Poppies, Third Estate, Harpy, [...]
November 4, 2009 at 6:06 pm |
Wearing a poppy means you glorify war. Do you really think our soldiers fought for democracy and freedom? think again.
What about the freedom of these guys right at home?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_Canadian_internment
Brainwashed stupid nation we’ve become; we don’t question anything we just let stuff shoved down our throat.
Fuck poppies and fuck the ignorant people who wear them.
November 7, 2009 at 7:07 pm |
The poppy doesn’t just represent those lost in war, they also represent those of the families of whom gave the ultimate sacrifice. Even if you don’t support war, if someone’s brother, sister, son, daughter, mother or father went to war without your blessing and died, the poppy would be for you showing we know how you feel. Stop being so selfish and think of others. The poppy isn’t just for those who died. We WILL remember them.
November 8, 2009 at 12:22 pm |
I think each of us choose to wear it (or not) for our own reasons. For me, it’s really about remembering those who paid the ultimate price due to the collective decisions of a few. It’s not so much about those who bear arms but also those who fell as ‘collatoral damage’. I wear a poppy in the hope that when it comes to pushing the button, the politicians will keep this in mind.
C K
November 8, 2009 at 1:20 pm |
C K, indeed it is up to each of us to decide whether we wear a poppy or not. And people remember their own personal experiences of war. But it is the overall political symbolism, at the Centotaph imperialist warmongers stand there hypocritically remembering the ‘collatoral damage’ during the 1 mins silence. Thousands upon thousands died, for example, on the battlefields of the Somme. And all wars, what is the point? To defend imperialist interests.
November 8, 2009 at 1:08 pm |
A positive aspect to the Poppy Appeal: http://london.indymedia.org/articles/2732
November 8, 2009 at 1:11 pm |
More here: http://truth-reason-liberty.blogspot.com/2009/10/why-poppy-appeal-subvertising-needed-to.html
I’ve read that the poppy sellers themselves were also doing this but can’t find the link right now.
November 8, 2009 at 1:14 pm |
Yeah, I heard about ’subverting’ the message esp. prosecute Blair etc.