
I have been mulling this over for a couple of days as the Reclaim the Night demo last Saturday had kinda profound and demoralising impact on me. Suppose I just want to add a few more thing and said quite a bit at Helen’s blog (thanks as well for the solidarity).
Being shouted at and witnessing other women being shouted at for supporting rights of sex workers, also many of these women were questioned at the start of the demo by the police, why the hell were the agents of the state set on these women? It is utterly outrageous, it just seemed a way of silencing these women and criminalising them. Wrong, utterly stupidly wrong!
It also took me back 20-odd years ago at a LP women’s section meeting where we were discussing having a meeting on pornography and violence against women. My intervention consisted of suggesting that we should debate the various different views regarding pornography and censorship rather than just having a conference predicated on one line i.e. pro-censorship and that it is up to make up their own minds. The reply, literally, blew me away as I was told (and has been inscribed in my psyche) that feminists like myself who live in their ivory towers don’t understand violence and that if I had experienced violence then I would support a pro-censorship position. I remember sitting there feeling powerless wanting the floor to swallow me up. I couldn’t grasp what precisely I had said to warrant this level of personal outburst. It hurt and the words stuck especially as it had been only 8 mths previously that my then boyfriend had hit me for the last time.
So then 1989 onwards to 2009, that’s was what I was reminded me while being shouted at. Our material experiences shape our politics for sure but we still need critical analysis/politics not where everything is reduced to the personal. That’s not debate. What I am trying to say, to articulate is debate me on my views, my politics instead of throwing personal insults at me or making assumptions of my life experiences.
Debates, fundamentally, need counter-balanced arguments which are unfortunately left out of the political equation and therefore if you don’t hold a certain line on sex work and pornography then you are marginalised, silenced and no platformed. It is about controlling the debate which stymies debate and openness. I admit my politics are contrary to these given prescriptives as I am anti-censorship of porn (certainly oppose state censorship) and support the decriminisation and unionisation of sex workers.
Those are my views and I believe I have every right to argue them within the feminist movement and everyone who opposes me has every right to argue against me. That’s debate, that’s democracy.
Finally, I define myself as a socialist feminist and last weekend just made me realise how the feminist movement seems lost in the past unable to move on. The feminist movement is about highlighting, campaigning, challenging and fighting against patriarchal norms that exist in a capitalist society, Twenty years ago and twenty years on it all seems stuck in the same repetitive groove. Being a feminist is part of my political make-up, it is all about solidarity, unity and making alliances that will create a strong vibrant and dynamic movement that is open to debate and differences of opinion. It is also about solidarity with sex workers and trans women. Solidarity and unity for all women is the key.