I have been cautious in making any comment about the allegations made against Julian Assange by two women because we don’t know what happened. He has not been charged but will be questioned by the police.
My own view is that wouldn’t it be better to see the evidence tested in court rather than pre-judge the situation, a case of due process? I am getting really sick and tired that there’s an assumption out there that these allegations are smears and are dismissed as such which therefore makes these women out to be liars, that it was, for example, some kind of “CIA honey trap”…!!!!!! We don’t know the full story. Wait for the full story, wait to see the evidence tested in court.
And it is also becoming clear just because Assange is becoming the hero of the Left there is an assumption just because of the Wikileaks and hatred of him by the global establishment there’s a belief he is being set-up.
But how do we know?